Game Of Thrones Glover
Game of Thrones on HBO is a TV adaption of George R.R. Martin's books, a Song of Ice and Fire. For those fans who know and love the books, then you can't help but love the TV adaptation. It is difficult to translate books into movies or TV series, but HBO's GoT made it look easy.
SigilGlover.pngHouse Gloverof is a vassal house that holds fealty to of. Their lands are north-west of Winterfell, located along the Bay of Ice and extending into the Wolfswood. Their stronghold is a castle called Deepwood Motte and the head of the house is the.House Glover's sigil is a silver fist on scarlet.Members. Lord, the current head of the family. Robett Glover, Galbart's younger brother and heir.
Sybelle Glover, formerly of House Locke, married to Robett. Gawen Glover, Robett and Sybelle's son. Erena Glover, Robett and Sybelle's newborn daughter.In the books In the novels, House Glover is a loyal and reliable vassal of the Starks. Their castle is a motte-and-bailey wooden castle located inland but close to the Bay of Ice.
Interactive Maps. Episode Guide.
Season 1. Season 2. Season 3. Season 4.
Season 5. Season 6. TV-Book Differences. Season 3 Differences. Season 4 Differences. Season 5 Differences. Factions.
Free Cities. Seven Kingdoms. Organizations. The Small Council.
Gotta say the trope that Northern houses are more 'loyal' has proven to be legit horse. Boltons, Karstarks, Umbers, Glovers, Manderleys - Oathbrakers, all of them.Well, loyalty is bi-directional.
They feel the King in the North abondended them. They would probably still follow the Starks, but they won't follow Targaryens. I can sympathize with the logic of loyalty here.Compared to non-Northern houses, the North actually was pretty local - but realistically, there will be always breakers of fealty. I like this realism.
Loyalty is formally about Houses, but if things get rough, it's a lot about individual persons and beliefs, fears, cowardice, greed and whatever. Well, loyalty is bi-directional. They feel the King in the North abondended them. They would probably still follow the Starks, but they won't follow Targaryens.
I can sympathize with the logic of loyalty here.Compared to non-Northern houses, the North actually was pretty local - but realistically, there will be always breakers of fealty. I like this realism. Loyalty is formally about Houses, but if things get rough, it's a lot about individual persons and beliefs, fears, cowardice, greed and whatever.Their disloyalty has nothing to do with the Targaryens. Every single one of the houses I mentioned showed their disloyalty before Dany even landed in Westeros.Boltons, Karstarks, and Umbers all fought against the Starks, while Umbers and Manderleys refused the call. Like I said, Oathbreakers. Not saying it wouldn't happen. But the show tries to sell this farce that the northerners are so loyal and only loyal to other northerners.
Yet, almost all the houses have betrayed their leaders who have happened to all be northerners.Sure, just when people need to unite more than ever, they argue even more. Adds to the tension.I happen to believe that the key theme of the whole story is an allegory about Climate Change.
It is now more urgent than ever that we, the human race, wake up and make drastic changes before it's too late. And we're not - some president or other even argues the whole thing is a Chinese hoax, like Grumpkins.
Robert Glover Game Of Thrones
Where have you seen that?There are a lot of Northern Houses that are loyal and some that aren't. I'd call that realistic.What do we know about Lannister bannerman?We have never heard or seen of any Lannister bannermen abandoning the Lannisters, despite the many public crimes they have committed, Cersei still has the Lannister army that is still fighting for her.Compared to the Starks, where every named Northern house except for the Mormonts have betrayed them, in some cases, with the Glovers, betrayed them twice.